EPA wants to label certain ‘forever chemicals’ as hazardous substances
The most recent science suggests that these chemicals are much more hazardous to human health than scientists had initially thought and are probably more dangerous at levels thousands of times lower than previously believed. Exposure to the chemical may lead to reproductive problems, heart issues, breathing problems, cancer and problems with the immune system.
The EPA’s new proposal is to designate two of the most widely used PFAS — PFOA and PFOS — as hazardous substances under Superfund regulations. The EPA said it will publish the proposed rule in the federal register in the next several weeks. That would give the public 60 days to comment before the rule could be finalized.
If the proposal is finalized, releases of certain amounts of these chemicals would have to be reported to the government. The EPA believes this would encourage the companies to have better waste management practices at the facilities that handle the chemical.
The EPA said the rule could also make the polluter pay fines and cleanup costs.
“Communities have suffered far too long from exposure to these forever chemicals. The action announced today will improve transparency and advance EPA’s aggressive efforts to confront this pollution, as outlined in the Agency’s PFAS Strategic Roadmap,” EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan said in an agency news release. “Under this proposed rule, EPA will both help protect communities from PFAS pollution and seek to hold polluters accountable for their action.”
These chemicals can easily migrate into air, dust, food, soil and water. People can also be exposed to them through food packaging and industrial work.
“EPA actions are too little and too late,” Whitehouse said. “This administration and previous administrations have been fiddling around trying not to upset chemical companies and communities suffer.”
Whitehouse said while a Superfund designation means that certain sites might be able to be cleaned up using Superfund monies and Superfund designations, it will be years down the road.
“A few communities may benefit from the proposed rule, but it doesn’t solve the problem and the problem is that the EPA refuses to develop management standards for PFAS waste,” Whitehouse said. Since they are forever chemicals, there is no real, safe way to dispose of them.
“We’re just going to get more and more Superfund sites. So it’s only a band-aid on a problem that’s being created every day,” Whitehouse said. “This is only fixing a problem that’s already been created as opposed to stopping future problems.”